MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2569413152 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2016.7798254

Coordinated distributed MHE for linear systems

2016· article· en· W2569413152 on OpenAlexaff
Tianrui An, Jinfeng Liu, Fraser Forbes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorComputer scienceConvergence (economics)Sampling (signal processing)Scheme (mathematics)State (computer science)Mathematical optimizationLinear systemControl theory (sociology)Function (biology)Process (computing)Noise (video)Distributed computingAlgorithmControl (management)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The distributed framework has been considered as one promising framework for the control of large-scale systems. In this work, we propose a coordination algorithm for distributed moving horizon state estimators (MHEs) for discrete-time linear systems composed of subsystems. In the proposed coordinated distributed MHE (CDMHE) scheme, each subsystem is associated with a local MHE. In the design of a local MHE, a coordinating term is incorporated into its cost function which is determined by an upper-layer coordinator. At each sampling time, a local MHE estimates its local state and system noise, then sends them to the coordinator. The coordinator calculates a price vector based on information received from all the local MHEs and sends the price vector together with the calculated interaction estimates to each local MHE. The above steps are performed iteratively every sampling time. It is shown that the CDMHE scheme is able to achieve the estimation performance of the corresponding centralized design if convergence at each sampling time is ensured. A simulation study based on a chemical process is used to illustrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207