MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

External force observer for medium-sized humanoid robots

2016· preprint· en· W2569453267 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Locomotion and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanoid robotInverted pendulumRobotComputer scienceTorqueControl theory (sociology)Inertial measurement unitSagittal planeObserver (physics)SimulationArtificial intelligencePhysicsNonlinear systemControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce a method to estimate the magnitude of an external force applied on a humanoid robot. The approach does not require using force/torque sensors but instead uses measurements from commonly available force-sensing resistors (FSR) inserted under the feet of the humanoid robot. This approach is particularly interesting for affordable medium-sized humanoid robots such as Nao and Darwin-OP. The main idea is to use a simplified dynamic model of a linear inverted pendulum model (LIPM) subjected to an external force, and the information from the robot inertial measurement unit (IMU) and FSR sensors. The proposed method was validated on a Nao humanoid robot to estimate the external force applied in the sagittal plane through two experimental scenarios, and the results pointed out the efficiency of the proposed observer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Locomotion and ControlFrench-language works237,207