MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2569457813 · doi:10.7202/1037609ar

The Selection of the Practice of Ice Canoeing on the St. Lawrence River

2016· article· en· W2569457813 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Bernard Genest

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnologies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSafeguardingChristian ministryCultural heritagePromotion (chess)Intangible cultural heritageHistoryInstitutionPolitical scienceLibrary scienceArchaeologyLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is precisely to outline in what manner and circumstances the Quebec Society of Ethnology came to make the request to the Quebec ministry of Culture for recognition of the practice of ice canoeing. In fact, ice canoeing was the second practice to be listed on the Quebec register on intangible cultural heritage since its institution in 2012. The author points out that the process is not as simple as might be assumed, and it is fortunate that the designation in terms of the Quebec Cultural Heritage Act, adopted in 2012, is not a trivial measure. It involves the minister’s giving status to a part of the intangible heritage of which knowledge, safeguarding, promotion or transferral is in the public interest .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEthnologiesSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207