Política de una fuga. Memoria y subjetivación política en la representación cinematográfica del poder desaparecedor en Argentina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo analiza tres películas sobre la representación de los Centros Clandestinos de Detención, Tortura y Exterminio en la última dictadura militar en Argentina (1976-1983): La noche de los lápices (1986) de Héctor Olivera, Garage Olimpo (1999) de Marco Bechis y Crónica de una fuga (2006) de Adrián Caetano. Nuestra lectura toma la idea de la fuga de la película de Caetano con el objetivo de desentrañar cómo estas representaciones cinematográficas, cada una en su momento, desbordaron las narrativas predominantes de la memoria histórica generando una suerte de desidentificación del espectador consigo mismo y con su rol en las políticas de la memoria. Para ello destacamos el análisis de ciertas secuencias específicas o imágenes políticas singulares que produjeron una torsión de la subjetivación y cuestionaron el fundamento político de esas narrativas. Desde esa perspectiva, la figura de la fuga se constituye en un locus de inteligibilidad para pensar cuáles son los límites del proceso contemporáneo de monumentalización de la memoria histórica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".