Perancangan Aplikasi Property Perumahan dengan Visualisasi Objek 3D Berbasis Mobile
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Property perumahan merupakan sebidang tanah yang sudah dikembangkan dan digunakan untuk kebutuhan tempat tinggal. Membuat keputusan untuk membeli sebuah property bukanlah hal yang mudah karena banyak faktor yang dapat dipertimbangkan. Biasanya seorang pembeli hanya dapat melihat property yang ingin dibeli melalui brosur, majalah, ataupun media massa lainnya, sehingga untuk melihat secara detil property yang ingin dibelinya, pembeli masih harus datang ke lokasi property tersebut. Visualisasi objek secara 3D dimaksudkan untuk mempermudah pembeli dalam melihat perumahan secara lebih realistis hanya melalui smartphone tanpa harus pergi ke lokasi perumahan tersebut.??? Visualisasi objek secara 3D akan memudahkan penjual memvisualisasikan dan memasarkan property yang akan dijual, dimana seorang agen dapat meng-upload property beserta file 3D agar dapat diakses dan juga memudahkan pembeli dalam menemukan property perumahan yang sesuai dengan yang diinginkan, dimana melalui visualisasi objek secara 3D maka pembeli seolah-olah sedang berada di lokasi property tanpa harus datang ke lokasi property tersebut.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Software About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Other design | high |
| grok | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Other design | high |
| opus | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Other design | medium |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it