MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2569747599

Beginning and ending of Anne Hebert's 'Burden of Dreams' : Polysemy of a journey of identity

2007· article· fr· W2569747599 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jaap Lintvelt

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopos theoryReading (process)Identity (music)PolysemyPresentation (obstetrics)Close readingKey (lock)LiteratureSociologyVariety (cybernetics)ArtLinguisticsAestheticsPhilosophyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The protagonist of Anne Hebert's Burden of Dreams (1992) goes on a journey from Quebec to Paris that contributes to the evolution of his personal and cultural identity The novel's title already tells us that "dreams" will play. a key role both on a thematic level and in shaping the reading protocol. An original combination of spatio-temporal realism and oneirism contributes to the text's polysemy. Analysis focuses initially on the beginning of the novel: the incipit in medias res, the topoi, the reading protocol, focalisation, the successive presentation of characters, and thematisation: Analysis of the end of the novel shows that the effect of the journey of identity on Julien's personality admits of a variety of interpretations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)→Same topicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis→French-language works237,207→