Molecular collisions and reactive scattering in external fields: Are field-induced couplings important at short range?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We use accurate quantum scattering calculations to elucidate the role of short-range molecule-field interactions in atom-molecule inelastic collisions and abstraction chemical reactions at low temperatures. We consider two examples: elastic and inelastic scattering of NH(Σ3) molecules with Mg(S1) atoms in a magnetic field; reactive scattering LiF + H → Li + HF in an electric field. Our calculations suggest that, for non-reactive collision systems and abstraction chemical reactions, the molecule-field interactions cannot generally be neglected at short range because the atom-molecule potential passes through zero at short range. An important exception occurs for Zeeman transitions in atom-molecule collisions at magnetic fields ≲1000 G, for which the molecule-field couplings need only be included at large ρ outside the range of the atom-molecule interaction. Our results highlight the importance of an accurate description of ρ-dependent molecule-field interactions in quantum scattering calculations on molecular collisions and chemical reactions at low temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".