MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2570321729 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.769.769

Tissue Oxygenation By Transfusion in Severe Anemia with Lactic Acidosis (TOTAL): A Prospective, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial of Blood Storage Duration

2015· article· en· W2570321729 on OpenAlexaff
Aggrey Dhabangi, Brenda Ainomugisha, Christine Cserti‐Gazdewich, Henry Ddungu, Dorothy Kyeyune, Ezra Musisi, Robert O. Opoka, Christopher P. Stowell, Sunny Dzik

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLactic acidosisAnemiaAcidosisRandomized controlled trialBlood transfusionAdverse effectHemolysisAnesthesiaSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Each year approximately 100 million units of blood are transfused worldwide. Current regulations allow RBCs to be stored in approved solutions for up to five or six weeks. Regulatory agencies use cell survival studies and in vitro markers of hemolysis, rather than measures of oxygen delivery, to establish the maximal duration of blood storage. During storage, RBCs undergo cumulative structural, biochemical, and enzymatic changes that collectively might impair the ability of erythrocytes to deliver oxygen to tissues and contribute to adverse patient outcomes. Study design and Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial comparing short-storage versus longer-storage RBCs for tissue oxygen delivery as measured by reduction in blood lactate levels in severe anemia. We studied 290 patients presenting to a university hospital urgent care facility with a hemoglobin ≤5g/dL and lactate ≥5mM. Patients were children, age 6 to 60 months, whose lactic acidosis was due to severe anemia and who did not have shock, trauma, impaired cardiac function, refractory hypoxia, need for pressors, liver disease or tissue injury. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive leukoreduced RBCs stored 1-10 days (n=145) versus 25-35 days (n=145). All patients received 10mL/kg of RBCs during hours 0-2; and, if indicated per protocol, an additional 10mL/kg during hours 4-6. The study was conducted in Kampala, Uganda and registered as #NCT01586923 at clinicaltrials.gov. Results: Hour 0 was the start of transfusion.We measured blood lactate levels at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours following transfusion. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a lactate ≤3mM at 8 hours. Other measures included cerebral tissue oxygen saturation measured non-invasively, clinical and laboratory changes following transfusion, survival, and 30-day follow-up. At presentation, the mean hemoglobin was 3.7 ±1.3g/dL and mean lactate was 9.3 ±3.4mM. RBC storage averaged 7.8 ±2.1 days in the shorter-storage arm and 31.6 ±2.8 days in the longer-storage arm without overlap. See Fig 1A. The proportion achieving a lactate ≤3mM at 8 hours was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.49-0.66, shorter-storage) versus 0.61 (95% CI, 0.52-0.69, longer-storage), p=0.72, a result meeting the pre-specified margin of non-inferiority. Mean lactate levels were not statistically different between the two arms at 2, 4, 6, 8 or 24 hours. See Fig 1B. Kaplan-Meier analysis and global non-linear regression revealed no difference in lactate clearance between the shorter-storage and longer-storage groups. Clinical assessment, serial measurements of hemoglobin concentration, cerebral tissue oxygen saturation, and electrolyte abnormalities improved to the same degree in the two groups following transfusion. Adverse events, survival, and 30-day recovery were not significantly different between the two groups. Pre-specified sub-group analysis among patients receiving 20mL/kg of RBCs revealed no significant differences in outcomes. Given the severity of anemia, transfusions represented 60% to 90% of the patients' pre-transfusion red cell mass. Conclusion and Relevance: This is the first major randomized trial specifically testing whether prolonged storage RBCs deliver oxygen as well as short-storage RBCs. We tested the two extremes of blood storage duration and found that longer-storage RBCs were not inferior to shorter-storage RBCs for oxygen delivery as measured by reduction of elevated blood lactate levels, improved cerebral oxygen saturation, clinical outcomes, laboratory results, or adverse events. The results carry relevance for health policy decisions regarding the acceptable duration of RBC storage worldwide. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicBlood transfusion and management→French-language works237,207→