Comparisons of several variants of continuous quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, an extensive numerical analysis is carried out to investigate the effects of different quantum-based operators on the performance of continuous quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithms (QEAs). In this context, different variants of quantum-inspired evolutionary operators are adopted for numerical simulations. Furthermore, some novel chaos-enhanced QEAs are proposed and their performances are evaluated through the numerical comparative study. Based on evaluating the accuracy, robustness, convergence, scalability and sensitivity to initialisation of the rival methods, it is indicated that the algorithmic structure of QEAs is prone to being combined with chaotic maps. The results demonstrate that chaotically implemented QEAs can effectively explore/exploit the solution spaces of different landscapes and dimensionality, and finally, converge to acceptable regions within the solution domain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it