MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2570411120

Fortalecimiento de la democracia en las Américas: la Organización de los Estados Americanos en acción

2016· article· es· W2570411120 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francisco Guerrero Aguirre

Bibliographic record

VenuePluralidad y Consenso · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Organizacion de los Estados Americanos (OEA) es el organismo regional mas antiguo del mundo. La Primera Conferencia Internacional de Estados Americanos, que se realizo en Washington, DC entre octubre de 1889 y abril de 1890, llevo al establecimiento de la Union Internacional de Republicas Americanas y, posteriormente, abrio el camino para la adopcion de la Carta de la Organizacion de los Estados Americanos en Bogota, Colombia, en 1948. La Organizacion fue establecida para alcanzar entre sus Estados miembros “un orden de paz y de justicia, fomentar su solidaridad, robustecer su colaboracion y defender su soberania, su integridad territorial y su independencia”, como esta estipulado en el articulo 1 de la Carta. La Organizacion constituye el foro politico hemisferico por excelencia, el unico espacio en donde concurren Canada, los Estados Unidos de America y todos los paises de America Latina y el Caribe en igualdad de condiciones.1 Los Estados miembros eligen al Secretario General para un periodo de cinco anos, con la posibilidad de reeleccion una sola vez consecutiva. El Secretario General Luis Almagro fue electo el 18 de marzo de 2015 y asumio el cargo el 26 de mayo del mismo ano. Las lineas centrales de su gestion estan claramente definidas en torno a la democracia y los derechos humanos, como prioridades de su administracion, en su esfuerzo de asegurar mas derechos para mas personas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePluralidad y ConsensoSame topicInternational Relations in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207