MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2570413750

Modelling and simulation of optical integrated networks for early-stage design exploration (WIP)

2016· article· en· W2570413750 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSummer Computer Simulation Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware deploymentComputer scienceThroughputBandwidth (computing)Context (archaeology)Graphical user interfacePower consumptionInterface (matter)Communications systemSystems engineeringDistributed computingComputer architectureEmbedded systemPower (physics)EngineeringWirelessComputer networkTelecommunicationsSoftware engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrical interconnects will reach their physical limitations as we scale down components on systems' designs. At the same time, the demand for high throughput communication architectures rises. Optical integrated networks (OIN) are currently considered to be one of the most promising paradigm in this design context: they present high bandwidth and low power consumption. Such communication infra-structures lack currently a fast and reliable modelling method, which eases their development. In this context, this paper presents a modelling strategy and simulation tool for OIN-based systems, where the deployment of systems is performed entirely through a Graphical User Interface (GUI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it