MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2570498215 · doi:10.1177/1077546316687923

A new real-time signal processing approach for frequency-varying machinery

2017· article· en· W2570498215 on OpenAlexaff
Jie Zhang, Hongli Gao, Qiyue Liu, Christopher Grebe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vibration and Control · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSIGNAL (programming language)Signal processingTime–frequency analysisVibrationComputer scienceSampling (signal processing)Spectral densityStability (learning theory)Power (physics)Electronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)EngineeringAcousticsArtificial intelligenceDigital signal processingDetectorComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Development of condition monitoring approaches has played a key role in the stability and safety of frequency-varying machinery operations. Conventional time–frequency analysis methods suffer problems such as analysis results being too complex to realize highly intelligent and automated condition monitoring systems. Blind source separation is an attractive tool due to its excellent performance in separating defect source signals from their mixtures without detailed knowledge of sources and mixing processes; however, it can only be applied under some strict conditions. In this paper, a nonuniform sampling model is built and a new processing algorithm of frequency-varying signal is proposed. The relationship between the power spectral density (PSD) of the vibration signal of frequency-varying machinery and frequencies at different rotational speeds is derived. The proposed method can adaptively eliminate the influence of the varying rotational speed in the revised PSD. Some classical signal analysis methods are implemented to compare with the proposed approach by simulations. An experiment has been conducted by using a JD-1 wheel/rail simulation facility to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vibration and ControlSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207