Pd‐PEPPSI‐IPent<sup>Cl</sup>: A Useful Catalyst for the Coupling of 2‐Aminopyridine Derivatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
precatalyst (PEPPSI=pyridine-enhanced precatalyst preparation stabilisation initiation) has been demonstrated to be highly effective in the coupling of hetero(aryl)chlorides to free 2-aminopyridine substrates to produce N-(hetero)aryl-2-aminopyridine derivatives. The catalyst has proven to be competent in a number of other difficult cross-coupling reactions owing to the combination of the 3-pentyl-substituted N-aryl groups and the chlorines on the backbone of the N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) core. This same reactivity here allows couplings to take place under very mild conditions (e.g., NaBHT (BHT=2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) or carbonate base) such that sensitive functional groups including esters, ketones and nitriles are tolerated. Key is that the same bulk that drives the cross-coupling also mitigates poisoning of the Pd centre with the 2-aminopyridine functionality in the starting materials and/or products, which forces the catalyst into inactive, stable resting states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".