MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2570701716 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2016.7799004

Model predictive control of coupled hyperbolic PDEs and ODEs

2016· article· en· W2570701716 on OpenAlexaff
Qingqing Xu, Stevan Dubljević

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Controllability of Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdeDiscretizationModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Optimal controlRealization (probability)Applied mathematicsBoundary (topology)MathematicsLinear-quadratic regulatorMathematical optimizationHyperbolic partial differential equationDistributed parameter systemState spaceQuadratic equationController (irrigation)Partial differential equationComputer scienceControl (management)Mathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper addresses model predictive control design for a set of coupled hyperbolic PDEs and ODEs. The PDEs and ODEs system are connected through the boundary of PDEs system. The overall system contains infinite-dimensional state space extended with the finite-dimensional state space which provides the framework for constrained optimal control law realization. In this work, the discrete PDEs-ODEs system is obtained by using Cayley-Tustin time discretization without applying spatial approximation of underlying PDEs. The model predictive control is designed by utilizing standard constrained optimization obtained control law which leads to quadratic regulator design accounting for input or/and state/output constraints. Finally, the controller performance is assessed by a numerical simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStability and Controllability of Differential EquationsFrench-language works237,207