MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2570838639 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/834/2/l8

The Repeating Fast Radio Burst FRB 121102 as Seen on Milliarcsecond Angular Scales

2017· article· en· W2570838639 on OpenAlexafffund
B. Marcote, Z. Paragi, J. W. T. Hessels, A. Keimpema, Huib Jan van Langevelde, Yuping Huang, C. Bassa, Slavko Bogdanov, Geoffrey C. Bower, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Bryan Butler, R. M. Campbell, Shami Chatterjee, J. M. Cordes, Paul B. Demorest, M. A. Garrett, T. Ghosh, V. M. Kaspi, Casey Law, T. Joseph W. Lazio, M. A. McLaughlin, S. M. Ransom, C. J. Salter, Paul Scholz, Andrew Seymour, Andrew Siemion, L. G. Spitler, Shriharsh P. Tendulkar, Robert Wharton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsMcGill University
FundersPrecursory Research for Embryonic Science and TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryJet Propulsion LaboratoryMax-Planck-GesellschaftCalifornia Institute of TechnologyEuropean CommissionNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadUniversities Space Research AssociationNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesInstitut de Ciències del CosmosMcGill UniversityCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsFast radio burstPhysicsAstrophysicsAstronomyComputer scienceGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The millisecond-duration radio flashes known as fast radio bursts (FRBs) represent an enigmatic astrophysical phenomenon. Recently, the sub-arcsecond localization (∼100 mas precision) of FRB 121102 using the Very Large Array has led to its unambiguous association with persistent radio and optical counterparts, and to the identification of its host galaxy. However, an even more precise localization is needed in order to probe the direct physical relationship between the millisecond bursts themselves and the associated persistent emission. Here, we report very-long-baseline radio interferometric observations using the European VLBI Network and the 305 m Arecibo telescope, which simultaneously detect both the bursts and the persistent radio emission at milliarcsecond angular scales and show that they are co-located to within a projected linear separation of ≲40 pc (≲12 mas angular separation, at 95% confidence). We detect consistent angular broadening of the bursts and persistent radio source (∼2–4 mas at 1.7 GHz), which are both similar to the expected Milky Way scattering contribution. The persistent radio source has a projected size constrained to be ≲ 0.7 pc (≲0.2 mas angular extent at 5.0 GHz) and a lower limit for the brightness temperature of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>≳</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mspace width="0.33em"/> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi> </mml:math> . Together, these observations provide strong evidence for a direct physical link between FRB 121102 and the compact persistent radio source. We argue that a burst source associated with a low-luminosity active galactic nucleus or a young neutron star energizing a supernova remnant are the two scenarios for FRB 121102 that best match the observed data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations413
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207