MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2570847020 · doi:10.4000/questes.4371

Le solstice d’hiver et les traditions de Noël

2016· article· fr· W2570847020 on OpenAlexaff
Nadine Cretin

Bibliographic record

VenueQuestes · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNight-time city culture
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolsticeForestryHumanitiesEnvironmental scienceGeographyPhilosophyGeodesy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nos fêtes hivernales trouvent en grande partie leur origine dans des célébrations ancestrales ; de l’Antiquité à nos jours, elles ont été modifiées, détournées, abandonnées ou amplifiées. Déjà, dans l’ancienne Rome, le solstice d’hiver était célébré et donnait lieu aux Saturnales où l’on revivait l’Âge d’Or, temps mythique où tous les hommes étaient égaux. Ces fêtes, plus sages que ce que l’usage du mot laisse entendre, étaient marquées par de grands banquets domestiques où les esclaves, prof...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.013
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuestesSame topicNight-time city cultureFrench-language works237,207