GRUNEWALD, Michel, PUSCHNER, Uwe, BOCK, Hans Manfred, Le milieu intellectuel conservateur en Allemagne, sa presse et ses réseaux (1890-1960)/ Das konservative Intellektuellenmilieu, seine Presse und seine Netzwerke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce recueil, issu d’un colloque tenu à Metz en 2002, fait pendant à Le Milieu intellectuel de gauche en Allemagne, sa presse et ses réseaux, paru l’année précédente, lui aussi à la suite d’une rencontre organisée au Centre d’étude des périodiques de langue allemande de l’université de Metz, dirigé par M.G. L’appel à la notion de « milieu » n’a ici rien d’anodin. Elle fait appel à la thèse devenue classique de Rainer Lepsius, d’après laquelle la société allemande s’organiserait depuis le XIXe s...
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
How this classification was reachedexpand
The three-model screen
all 5,600 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Book review of a history of the German conservative intellectual milieu and its press; a review of a history book, not about contemporary research practice.
This is a review of a book about conservative intellectual networks in Germany, not metaresearch.
Book review of German conservative intellectual press networks; intellectual history, not metaresearch.
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".