MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2571071954 · doi:10.1167/16.12.570

Conceptual representations of scene categories in prefrontal cortex transcend sensory modalities

2016· article· en· W2571071954 on OpenAlexaff
Yaelan Jung, Bart Larson, Dirk B. Walther

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFace Recognition and Perception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStimulus modalityCategorizationSensory systemInferior frontal gyrusPrefrontal cortexPsychologyRepresentation (politics)Modality (human–computer interaction)Visual cortexCognitive psychologyComputer scienceModalitiesCognitionArtificial intelligenceNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our natural environment is composed of a rich tapestry of sights and sounds. How is this multimodal information from a real-world setting processed in our brain, forming a representation of a particular environment? A number of studies have shown that in the visual domain, several visual properties related to scene categories are identified and processed in scene-selective areas in the visual cortex. Moving beyond the purely sensory representations of scene categories, we are here looking for a more abstract and conceptual representation of scenes that transcends sensory modalities. To this end, we had participants look at scene images or listen to scene sounds while their neural activity was recorded in an MRI scanner. Using multi-voxel pattern analysis, we were able to decode scene categories not only in sensory cortex (image categories in visual cortex and sound categories in auditory cortex) but also in prefrontal cortex, which is known to engage in high-level cognitive functions. Furthermore, the scene representation in the middle and inferior frontal gyrus generalized across sensory modalities, as shown by successful cross-decoding of scene categories between images and sounds. Finally, we compared the error patterns of the neural decoder to those of human categorization from a separate behavioral experiment. We found significant agreement between behavioral errors and the errors of the neural decoder in the inferior and middle frontal gyrus, which shows that the information that humans use for categorical judgment is represented in these regions. These results indicate that there exists a conceptual level of scene representations in prefrontal cortex, which reflects human behavior and does not rely on any one sensory modality. To our knowledge, this is the first time that such a cross-modal conceptual representation of real-world scenes has been measured explicitly. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VisionSame topicFace Recognition and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207