Санкт-Петербургские галереи: итальянские мотивы на берегах Невы
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Formation and development of St. Petersburg brought a lot of innovations in the architecture of Russia. In particular, for the first time the open galleries went out on the facades of the streets here. Previously they were always the part of the inner quarter, domestic space, “the trade yards” for example. The beginning was made by D. Tresini (1720s, complex of Twelve Colleges and Gostiny dvor on the Vasilij Island). The idea was developed by Fr. B. Rastrelli, who proposed to use the two-storied arch galleries in the conception of the Big Gostiny dvor on Nevsky prospect (in the middle of 18 th century). And G. Quarenghi became the main architect of the mass construction of the gallery trade rows and trade yards in St. Petersburg between 18 th and 19 th centuries. In a consequence many architects have taken part in their developments. V. Stasov, K. Rossi and many unknown ones were among them. The experience of St. Petersburg was used in a lot of Russian cities and towns. And the view of the arch gallery added with the fire watch tower became the typical example of the Russian provincial center of the first part 19 th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it