MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2571237083

Telling datas story with graphics

2015· article· de· W2571237083 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sam Ransbotham

Bibliographic record

VenueMIT Sloan management review · 2015
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicWine Industry and Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOfficerChief executive officerPresentation (obstetrics)MarketingIndex (typography)ConstellationBusinessGraphicsAdvertisingManagementComputer scienceEconomicsPolitical scienceWorld Wide WebLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to Joseph D. Bruhin, chief information officer of Constellation Brands, experiments with graphic presentation of data are making it easier for sales people to see how they're performing right in the field. Constellation Brands, a distributor of beer and liquor, is a publicly traded S&P 500 Index and Fortune 1000 company, with 2015 net sales of approximately $6 billion and 7,600 employees. It is headquartered in Victor, New York, with operations in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, Italy, and Mexico. Joseph D. Bruhin is Constellation's senior vice president and chief information officer. Bruhin's role includes developing new tools for salespeople to use in the field and new measurements for understanding how products are performing at retail. He has been particularly focused on making data easy to analyze and understand. In an interview, Bruhin details the particular challenges faced by companies in the beverage alcohol business and the role that graphics are playing in helping employees more easily track sales against metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0100.015
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0090.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMIT Sloan management reviewSame topicWine Industry and TourismFrench-language works237,207