MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Extracellular Metabolite Biomarkers of Bortezomib Resistance in Multiple Myeloma Indicate Involvement of Unexpected Metabolic Pathways.

2009· article· en· W2571301763 on OpenAlexaff
Aalim M. Weljie, Paola Neri, Farzana Sayani, Nizar J. Bahlis

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBortezomibMetaboliteMetabolomicsExtracellularMetabolic pathwayMultiple myelomaProteasome inhibitorCell growthCell cultureChemistryPharmacologyBiologyProteasomeCancer researchBiochemistryMetabolismChromatographyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1839 Poster Board I-865 Introduction and Objectives: Bortezomib (BZ) is a chemotherapeutic agent approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). BZ acts through proteasome inhibition, inducing significant ER stress and ideally resulting in cell death. Unfortunately, nearly 20% of MM patients are primarily resistant to BZ treatment and responses to BZ are difficult to predict based on the currently available clinical, cytogenetic and genomic biomarkers. Our function hypothesis is that extracellular metabolites have a greater potential to be found in circulating biofluids as biomarkers. As a result we used a metabolite ‘footprinting’ approach in cell growth media to examine the metabolic consequences of BZ treatment using eight human MM cell lines, three of which have been determined to be less sensitive to BZ treatment than the others with a 10 fold difference in their IC50 at 24 hours (5 nM vs 50 nM). Our aims were 1) to establish whether analysis of growth media was suitable for monitoring metabolic changes and 2) to determine specific biopatterns of BZ resistance. Methods: Eight MM cell lines (MM1S, MM1R, INA6, U266, RPMI8266, OPM2, KMS11 and PCL1) were cultured under standard conditions without (control group, 10% FBS) or with bortezomib added (10nM). Media samples were taken for metabolic analysis at 6 and 24 hours for a total of 32 media profiles. Metabolite profiling was accomplished using gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). GC-MS data was analysed using AMDIS (NIST), and NMR data using Chenomx NMR Suite. Significant metabolites were identified using multivariate regression analysis by supervised projection methods (two-way orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis, O2PLS-DA) using SIMCA-P (Umetrics). Results: An average of 756 chemical or metabolite components per sample were profiled, which was reduced to a subset of 116 unique features that were shared in at least 75% of samples. An initial O2PLS-DA model was successfully built from the GC-MS feature set using both growth time (p=0.03) and BZ status (p=6.9e-13) in the Y-matrix. Figure 1 shows a scores plot, where each point represents a single sample, and the position is calculated as a combination of the underlying metabolite concentrations. Changes in cell growth were consistent with the known uptake of carbohydrate substrates and elimination of various amino acids and waste products such as lactate. The remarkable metabolic difference between BZ-treated and untreated cells resulted from reduced energy-related metabolites such as citric acid cycle intermediates and sugars, with a concomitant increase in selected amino acids. Intriguingly, the BZ-insensitive cell cultures exhibit overall metabolic phenotypes much more similar to the BZ-sensitive cultures than to the untreated group, with the exception of a single sample after 6 hours (denoted with an asterisk in Figure 1) which showed an averaged profile. To further probe the phenomenon of BZ resistance, the treated group was analyzed independently, with the 37 most influential components providing discriminating ability between the BZ-insensitive and BZ-sensitive cells (p= 0.04) in an OPLS-DA model. Conclusions: We conclude that metabolite footprinting is a reliable and robust method for monitoring metabolic events for both cell growth and BZ treatment. Furthermore, BZ-insensitivity is accompanied by a notable shift from carbohydrate metabolism to fatty acid metabolism, while the overall metabolic phenotype remains very similar in both BZ-sensitive and insensitive strains in the presence of the drug. This result suggests that BZ function remains largely intact in both sensitive and insensitive cell lines, and resistance is conferred through alternate mechanisms with measureable metabolic endpoints. Success in measuring extracellular metabolites also supports the notion of serum-accessible biomarkers or biopatterns of BZ resistance. The unique genetic instability underlying each cell line may provide a further avenue for characterizing resistance mechanisms along with analysis of various intracellular components. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→