MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2571310537 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2016-0356

Cyclic lateral response and failure mechanisms of semi-rigid pile in soft clay: centrifuge tests and numerical modelling

2017· article· en· W2571310537 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPileCentrifugeGeotechnical engineeringStiffnessPile capGeologyRigidity (electromagnetism)Wedge (geometry)Flow (mathematics)Mechanism (biology)Flexural rigidityStructural engineeringEngineeringMechanicsGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies on laterally loaded piles in clay have mainly focused on flexible and rigid piles. Little attention has been paid to semi-rigid piles (whose pile–soil stiffness lies somewhere between those of rigid and flexible piles), which may behave as either flexible piles or rigid piles, depending on the change in soil stiffness during cycling. This study aims to understand the cyclic lateral response of a repeatedly loaded semi-rigid pile in soft clay and the failure mechanisms of the soil around the pile, through a series of centrifuge model tests and three-dimensional finite element analyses using an advanced hypoplastic clay model. Numerical parametric studies were also performed to investigate the evolution of soil flow mechanisms with increasing pile rigidity. It is revealed that the semi-rigid pile behaved as if it were a flexible pile (i.e., flexural deformation dominated) during the first few cycles, but tended to behave like a rigid pile (i.e., rotational movement prevailed) during subsequent cycles, which progressively softened the surrounding soil. As a result, the mechanisms of soil flow around the semi-rigid pile exhibited an intermediate behaviour combining the mechanisms of both flexible and rigid piles. Three distinctive mechanisms were identified: a wedge-type mechanism near the surface, a full-flow mechanism (within the transverse sections) near the middle of the pile, and a rotational soil flow mechanism (in the vertical symmetrical plane of the pile) near the lower half of the pile. By ignoring the rotational soil flow mechanism, which has a much lower resistance than the full-flow mechanism, the American Petroleum Institute code (published in 2007) underestimated the cyclic bending moment and the lateral pile displacement by 10% and 69%, respectively. Application of jet grouting around the semi-rigid pile at shallow depth significantly altered the soil flow mechanism (i.e., it was a solely wedge-type mechanism around the grouted zone).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it