Children’s Storytelling App For Detecting Potential Child Sexual Abuse
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) is a global issue of concern warranting global mitigation strategies. This project designed a prototype storytelling app to foster uninhibited creative expression by children of their daily life events and associated feelings. By monitoring their children’s stories, parents and caregivers might be able to take supportive steps when stories reveal situations of potential CSA. Backed by a literature review and environmental scan, the prototype was designed through a participatory design process involving parents, caregivers and other adults concerned about CSA by way of a survey and focus groups. Participants were invited from Canada and India to examine cross-cultural notions around CSA and design elements. Research was conducted onsite in India for four months. Through further participatory steps, the prototype will be developed into an app that can be used by children both online and offline. The app will be hosted on a website to create a platform for parents to form a community of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it