MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2571617651 · doi:10.1182/blood.v106.11.101.101

A Lymphoid Progenitor Propagates AML in a Mouse Model of CALM/AF10 Positive Leukemia.

2005· article· en· W2571617651 on OpenAlexaff
Aniruddha J. Deshpande, Monica Cusan, Viajy P.S. Rawat, Hendrik Reuter, Leticia Quintanilla‐Martínez, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Peter Lichter, Stefan K. Bohlander, R. Keith Humphries, Michaela Feuring‐Buske, Christian Buske

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyeloidBone marrowMyeloid leukemiaLeukemiaProgenitor cellPopulationTransplantationSpleenBiologyCancer researchStem cellImmunologyMolecular biologyPathologyMedicineInternal medicineCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The identification of cancer stem cells is a major step towards the understanding of the pathogenesis of solid and hematological neoplasias and might have direct implications for the development of innovative therapeutic strategies aiming at the eradication of the tumor propagating cell. Here we describe that acute myeloid leukemia (AML), induced by the CALM/AF10 fusion gene, is propagated by a transformed lymphoid progenitor in a murine bone marrow (BM) transplantation model of t(10;11)(p13;q14) positive AML. When mice were transplanted with BM cells retrovirally engineered to express the C/A fusion, all animals (n=13) died from AML showing DJ rearrangement of the heavy chain of the IgH locus after a median of 110 days post transplantation. Diseased mice showed an accumulation of myeloid Gr1+/Mac1+ cells in the peripheral blood and spleen and a multi-organ infiltration by myeloperoxidase and chloracetate esterase positive cells in immunohistochemical sections. In the leukemic mice only a minor population counting for 6.7 % (± 2.1) cells in the BM displayed the B220 lymphoid antigen and lacked myeloid markers (on average 9.4 % ± 3). The majority of cells expressed myeloid markers (on average 82.9 % (± 8.6) Mac1+ cells, 86.4 % (± 3.7) Gr-1+ cells). Additionally, in the leukemic mice an average of 26.0 % (± 8.6) and 32.5 % (± 13.2) of these cells co-expressed B220 and Mac1 or B220 and Gr1, respectively, compared to 2.1 % (± 0.7) and 1.3 % (± 0.3), respectively, in GFP controls. Importantly, in vitro only the B220+/Mac− cell population had growth potential at the single cell level (seeding efficiency 29 %) compared to the B220+/Mac+ (1%) and B220−/Mac+ cells (1%). When the frequency of leukemia propagating cells (LPC) of the three different populations isolated from primary leukemic mice was determined by limiting dilution transplantation and Poisson statistics the frequency of the LPC was more than 380 fold higher in the ‘B220+/Mac1−’ population (1 in 36 cells) than in the ‘Mac1+/B220−’ bulk population (1 in 13906 cells) and more than 12fold increased compared to the B220+/Mac+ cells (1 in 437 cells). In vitro a single B220+/Mac1− cell isolated from a leukemic mouse was able to give rise to the B220+/Mac1+ as well as the Mac1+/ B220− population, both populations showing the identical genomic DJ rearrangement at the IgH locus as the initial B220+/Mac1− cell, demonstrating its capacity to differentiate into the myeloid lineage at the single cell level. The B220+/Mac1− population displayed a CD43+/AA4.1+/HSA+/CD19−/IL-7R− phenotype, was promiscuous in its transcription profile with positivity for EBF, but also MPO and lacked Pax5. Taken together, this murine leukemia model indicates that AML can be propagated from an early transformed lymphoid progenitor cell. The transformation of an early lymphoid cell, which is re-directed into the myeloid lineage by appropriate oncogenes, could explain recurrent observations of immunoglobulin rearrangements in patients with AML and provide a rationale for therapies, aiming at the elimination of the leukemia propagating cell with lymphoid characteristics, but sparing normal HSCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→