MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2572086468 · doi:10.1002/9781118900239.ch2

Electric Vehicle Battery Technologies

2016· other· en· W2572086468 on OpenAlexaff
İbrahim Dinçer, Halil S. Hamut, Nader Javani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery (electricity)Electric vehicleAutomotive engineeringBattery packElectric-vehicle batteryState (computer science)Energy storageEqualization (audio)Computer scienceState of chargeEngineeringElectrical engineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter describes state of the art technologies associated with the current and future battery chemistries, battery management systems (BMSs) and associated applications. Note that Nickel metal hydride (NiMH) chemistry first became commercially available for electric vehicles in the electric vehicle (EV) vehicle. Currently, it is mostly used Toyota Prius' battery pack. The chapter lists the main BMS functions as battery parameters detection, battery state estimation, on-board diagnosis (OBD), battery safety regulation and notification, charge control, battery equalization, thermal management, networking and data storage and more. It should be noted that these battery chemistries and its corresponding auxiliary components are expected to be funded substantially for EV and hybrid EV (HEV) development and therefore the costs are predicted to be reduced considerably in the near future. Radically different chemistries and approaches would be required to fulfill the very demanding requests of energy storage for today and the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207