MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2572086656

Activity Recognition Through Complex Event Processing: First Findings

2016· article· en· W2572086656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComplex event processingLeverage (statistics)Computer scienceAbstractionActivity recognitionEvent (particle physics)Process (computing)Data stream miningTask (project management)Representation (politics)Real-time computingHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligenceData miningProgramming languageEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The activities of daily living of a patient in a smart home environment can be detected to a large extent by the real-time analysis of characteristics of the habitat's electrical consumption. However, reasoning over the conduct of these activities occurs at a much higher level of abstraction than what the sensors generally produce. In this paper, we leverage the concept of Complex Event Processing (CEP), in which low-level data streams are progressively transformed into higher-level ones, to the task of activity recognition. We show how the use of an appropriate representation for each level of abstraction can greatly simplify the process. We also report on the use of an existing event stream processor to successfully implement the complete chain, from low-level sensor data up to a sequence of discrete and high-level actions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.321
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.056 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it