MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2572205280 · doi:10.1109/phm.2016.7819881

Dependence analysis of planetary gearbox vibration marginals

2016· article· en· W2572205280 on OpenAlexaff
Libin Liu, Ming J. Zuo, Xihui Liang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarginal distributionCopula (linguistics)Joint probability distributionFrequency domainTime–frequency analysisMonotone polygonVibrationMathematicsFrequency distributionStatisticsComputer scienceApplied mathematicsEconometricsMathematical analysisPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-frequency distribution (TFD) methods have been widely used for planetary gearbox fault detection. The aim of TFD is to represent a signal by a joint energy distribution in the time-frequency domain. Positivity is one of the most important properties for TFDs. Copula-based positive TFD construction methods utilize the time marginal, the frequency marginal and the dependence structure between the marginals. In this study, the dependence between the time marginal and the frequency marginal is studied explicitly by numerical and graphical rank-based statistics. Rank-based statistics are invariant with monotone transformations of the marginal distributions. This study demonstrates that the dependence does exist between the time marginal and the frequency marginal. The findings build one theoretical foundation for further study on copula-based TFD construction for one planetary gearbox vibration. Moreover, the results show that with the increase of the gearbox degradation, the Kendall's Tau's absolute value increases as well. This indicates that the more severe the fault is, the stronger the dependence would be.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.724

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGear and Bearing Dynamics AnalysisFrench-language works237,207