MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2572265446 · doi:10.1109/candar.2016.0087

How to Speed Up CUDA-WSat-PcL by 5x

2016· article· en· W2572265446 on OpenAlexaff
Heng Liu, Arrvindh Shriraman, Evgenia Ternovska

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFormal Methods in Verification
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCUDAComputer scienceParallel computingSpeedupGraphics processing unitGeneral-purpose computing on graphics processing unitsGraphicsComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Propositional Satisfiability Problem (SAT) is one of the most fundamental NP-complete problems, and is central to many domains of computer science. Utilizing a massively parallel architecture on a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) together with a conventional CPU on NVIDIA's Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) platform, this work proposes an efficient scheme to implement one parallel Stochastic Local Search (SLS) algorithms for SAT: CUDA-WSat-PcL. The implementation leads up to 5x speedup over the latest implementation of CUDA-WSat-PcL on CUDA. Additionally, our profiling results show that the CUDA portion of the new implementation is now at least 6x faster.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFormal Methods in VerificationFrench-language works237,207