Shear strength of interfaces in natural and in recycled aggregate concrete
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shear strength of interfaces in natural aggregate concrete and in recycled aggregate concrete has been investigated using initially uncracked push-off specimens by varying the following parameters: replacement level of the recycled aggregates (0%, 50%, and 100%), concrete grade (normal-strength and medium-strength), and clamping force on the shear plane. Development of truss action for resisting interface shear was indicated by the observed crack patterns in the tested specimens and a truss-based analysis recommended in the literature in combination with a simplified failure envelope for concrete subjected to biaxial stresses has been used for shear strength predictions of the tested specimens. The proposed methodology, which is considered to be more rational than the empirical shear strength models available in the literature was calibrated for both the concrete types and gave conservative and reasonably accurate shear strength predictions for selected experiments taken from the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it