MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W257286637

Transportation management associations: exploring public-private partnerships to enhance travel behaviour change programs

2006· article· en· W257286637 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K Luten

Bibliographic record

VenueTransport Research Forum · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipPublic transportPrivate sectorTraffic congestionHarbourStrengths and weaknessesBusinessPublic relationsEnvironmental planningPolitical scienceTransport engineeringPublic administrationGeographyEngineeringFinanceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Throughout the U.S., Canada, and Europe, the development of public-private partnership organisations has promoted enhanced private-sector involvement in transportation programs. Groups called Transportation Management Associations (TMAs) are involved in transportation issues in many different ways. TMAs emerged in the US in the early 1980s as public-private partnership organisations established to design and implement collaborative transportation management strategies addressing traffic congestion, mobility, and/or air quality problems in specific geographic areas. Today, approximately 150 TMAs are in operation, primarily in the US and Canada. Recently, start-up TMAs are also in the development stages in Great Britain (Dyce Area, Scotland) and New Zealand (North Harbour Industrial Area, North Shore City). This paper is intended to provide basic background information on the TMA experience in North America, and to present the lessons learned on TMA strengths and weaknesses from the author’s experience working with TMAs in a wide array of settings throughout North America. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E214666.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.307
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.107 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransport Research ForumSame topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207