Transportation management associations: exploring public-private partnerships to enhance travel behaviour change programs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Throughout the U.S., Canada, and Europe, the development of public-private partnership organisations has promoted enhanced private-sector involvement in transportation programs. Groups called Transportation Management Associations (TMAs) are involved in transportation issues in many different ways. TMAs emerged in the US in the early 1980s as public-private partnership organisations established to design and implement collaborative transportation management strategies addressing traffic congestion, mobility, and/or air quality problems in specific geographic areas. Today, approximately 150 TMAs are in operation, primarily in the US and Canada. Recently, start-up TMAs are also in the development stages in Great Britain (Dyce Area, Scotland) and New Zealand (North Harbour Industrial Area, North Shore City). This paper is intended to provide basic background information on the TMA experience in North America, and to present the lessons learned on TMA strengths and weaknesses from the author’s experience working with TMAs in a wide array of settings throughout North America. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E214666.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it