MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W257292881

TELLING 1922s STORY OF A NATIONAL CRIME: CANADA'S FIRST CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER AND THE ABORTED FIGHT FOR ABORIGINAL HEALTH CARE

2006· article· en· W257292881 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Adam J. Green

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of native studies · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOfficerPolitical scienceHumanitiesEthnologyLawSociologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract / Resume Over a seventeen-year career as Canada's first Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Peter H. Bryce accumulated statistics which suggested that Canada's Aboriginals were being decimated by Tuberculosis, and that the Federal government possessed the means to stop it. Eventually discharged for such reports, Bryce wrote, in 1922, The Story of a National Crime, which detailed both the evidence and the reluctance of the government to act. The resistance to his recommendations help reveal conceptual limitations in the growing professionalization of the civil service, and point to a layered and powerful set of cultural assumptions which continued to underwrite federal policy despite growing confidence in scientific and social scientific approaches. En dix-sept ans de carriere en tant que Directeur de la sante, Peter H. Bryce a rassemble de nombreuses donnees statistiques indiquant que les Autochtones du Canada etaient sur le point d'etre decimes par la tuberculose, et que le gouvernement federal avait les moyens d'intervenir. Apres avoir ete congedie a cause de tels rapports, Bryce ecrivit The Story of a National Crime en 1922. Il y presentait le detail des preuves accumulees, et y denoncait la reticence du gouvernement. Cette reticence revele les limites conceptuelles d'un service public alors en voie de professionalisation, et indique l'existence d'un ensemble de presomptions culturelles qui ont continue d'influencer la politique federale en depit d'une foi grandissante dans les sciences et dans les sciences sociales. In 1922, James Hope and Sons Limited published a paper which they sold for 35 cents a copy. The author, Peter H. Bryce, was certain that the information the paper contained was virtually unknown among the general population of the country. Its major conclusion: Canadian Aboriginals were dying, not from alcoholism or poverty as many suspected, but from communicable disease, mainly tuberculosis. As a medical expert and Canada's first Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Bryce was on a virtual crusade to wipe out this dreaded disease in Canada. His work was laced with sadness and frustration, derived both from the government's refusal to acknowledge and deal with the problem he had so long ago identified, and because this same government was impeding his own efforts to do so. This article examines the Federal career of Dr. Peter Bryce as it relates to Aboriginal health, a process which culminated in the publication of his 1922 work, The Story of a National Crime, It explores, as did Bryce himself some eighty years ago, how the same government that had hired a doctor to deal with the health concerns of Canada's Aboriginals had then reversed this commitment when the information collected revealed that much more time and money than originally planned for would be needed. The essay builds upon the body of work already completed on Bryce's findings,1 and uses Bryce's own papers to suggest that his conclusions were both a reaction to the dominant cultural dynamics of his era, as well as an example of the growing belief in a scientific discourse in the federal civil service. In addition, this paper adds a layer of complexity to the debate surrounding Aboriginal assimilation in the early 20th century. Although assimilation would have certainly been the goal of Bryce's Aboriginal policy, forced extinction was not. Moreover, Bryce challenged fundamental cultural attitudes towards the Aboriginal population at a time when many Canadians believed this civilization to be all but technically extinct. Such an attitude was, as other scholars have noted, a prevailing assumption of Bryce's superior, Duncan Campbell Scott.2 Like Scott, in the absence of substantive evidence to the contrary, many Canadians believed the Aboriginals were dying out because of their own devices, and thus common opinion held that Native-government relations seemed to conform to the structures entrenched in the Indian Act.3 Dr. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of native studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207