MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2572959914

A Computational Study of Late Talking in Word-Meaning Acquisition

2011· article· en· W2572959914 on OpenAlexaff
Aida Nematzadeh, Afsaneh Fazly, Suzanne Stevenson

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLanguage Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Meaning (existential)Computational modelPsychologyCognitive psychologySituational ethicsVocabularyContrast (vision)Cognitive scienceLinguisticsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Late talkers (LTs)-children who show a marked delay in vocabulary learning-are at risk for Specific Language Impairment (SLI), and much research has focused on identifying factors contributing to this phenomenon.We use a computational model of word learning to further shed light on these factors.In particular, we show that variations in the attentional abilities of the computational learner can be used to model various identified differences in LTs compared to normally-developing children: delayed and slower vocabulary growth, greater difficulty in novel word learning, and decreased semantic connectedness among learned words.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicLanguage Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207