MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2573004808

Venta de Berlanga y Valverde de Reyna a la Marquesa de Villanueva del Río en 1586

2016· article· es· W2573004808 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manuel Maldonado Fernández

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de estudios extremeños · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Iberia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReignHumanitiesEmperorPleadingQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographyArtArchaeologyHistoryAncient historyPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolLa integridad territorial del senorio santiaguista en la actual Extremadura se mantuvo desde finales del siglo XIII hasta el reinado de Carlos I (V de Alemania), fechas en las que se inicia el desmantelamiento territorial de los maestrazgos, alegando dificultades financieras y defensa de los intereses de la cristiandad. Siguiendo esta politica, Felipe II separo de la Orden de Santiago y de su encomienda de Reina a Berlanga, Valverde, sus terminos y un cuarto de legua cuadrada de la encomienda de Azuaga y Granja para, acto seguido, en 1586 vender lo enajenado a la marquesa viuda de Villanueva del Rio. EnglishThe territorial integrity of the manor governed by the Order of Santiago in present-day Extremadura, was maintained from the end of the 13th century until the reign of Charles I of Spain (Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor), when the territorial dismantling of the Order’s dominions began, pleading financial difficulties and the protection of Christian interests. Under this policy, Philip II withdrew Berlanga, Valverde, their municipal areas and a quarter of square legua of the encomienda of Azuaga and Granja, from the Order of Santiago and its encomienda of Reina. Immediately thereafter, in 1586, the alienated lands were sold to the widow Marchioness of Villanueva del Rio

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de estudios extremeñosSame topicMedieval and Early Modern IberiaFrench-language works237,207