REPRESENTACIONES SOCIALES DE LOS ESTUDIANTES CON RELACIÓN A LA VIOLENCIA ENTRE PARES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This investigation is developed in the Provincia de Quebec educative public institution, located in the Usme fifth locality, in Bogot, Colombia. The purpose is to know and analyze fifth-grade student's social representations about peer-to-peer violence, recognizing their own voices and perspectives about this problem. This research is qualitative in nature, following a hermeneutic approach. It was developed in seven focus groups, where some cases of physical, verbal or relational violence occur. Researches go in depth in the participants' social representations. Three categories were defined for the purpose of data analysis: context conditions that allow for the construction of social representations, cognitive structuring of the social representations about peer-to-peer violence, and the attitudinal dimension of social representations about peer-to-peer violence. Hence, it can be concluded that children's social representation about peer-to-peer violence is influenced by their cognitive process and experiences into the school, familiar and social contexts, generating representations that legitimize practices based on authoritarian,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".