An Efficient Approach for Mining Frequent Patterns over Uncertain Data Streams
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knowledge discovery in big data is one of most interesting topics in state-of-the-art research, and frequent patterns mining is a major task. With the rapid growth of modern technology, high volumes of data-which are of different veracities (i.e., may be precise or uncertain)-are flowing at a high velocity all over the world. Properties of data temporally changes with changes in the people's interests, which make the data dynamic. Due to the uncertainty and dynamic properties of data, finding appropriate and efficient approach to ensure the efficient usage of available resources has become a great challenge. In this paper, we design a new memory-efficient data structure, called Uncertain Stream (US)-tree, which stores recent meta-data. We also develop a probabilistic, sliding window based, efficient algorithm-called Uncertain Stream Frequent Pattern (USFP)-growth-for mining frequent patterns from uncertain data streams. Our comprehensive performance evaluation shows that USFP-growth is correct and efficient when compared with recent related approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it