MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2573592119 · doi:10.1177/036215370403400111

Book Review: Personality Adaptations: A New Guide to Human Understanding in Psychotherapy and Counselling

2004· article· en· W2573592119 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactional Analysis Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicTransactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransactional analysisPsychotherapistPsychologyMassageWifePsychoanalysisMedicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Book Review: Personality Adaptations: A New Guide to Human Understanding in Psychotherapy and Counselling." Transactional Analysis Journal, 34(1), pp. 96–97 Additional informationNotes on contributorsPeter GoodmanPeter Goodman, M.A., M.T., Certified Transactional Analyst, has lived in Nova Scotia, Canada, since 1989. Raising four daughters with his wife and life partner, Mary Goodman, Peter practices contemplative psychotherapy and redecision therapy with individuals, couples, families, and groups. Additionally trained in medically applied massage therapies for the treatment of chronic pain, Peter is cofounder of East Wind Health Associates, an integrative medicine clinic. He is currently training for his second-degree black belt in tae kwon do.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it