MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2573632676 · doi:10.7202/1038556ar

Le processus de racialisation du cas Sacco-Vanzetti : entre pouvoir et résistance

2016· article· fr· W2573632676 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Anaïs Hélie-Martel

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d histoire · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesAlibiPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le procès de Nicola Sacco et Bartolomeo Vanzetti aurait dû être un cas banal dans les années 1920. Pourtant, il deviendra vite célèbre, traversant frontières et océans, par la forme qu’a prise le procès se concentrant davantage sur l’allégeance politique et l’origine ethnique des hommes que sur leur alibi. Le présent article se penchera sur le processus de racialisation des deux hommes à travers le procès, qui a été usé à la fois comme un outil de domination et de résistance. Cet article examine ainsi la complexité rattachée au concept de race.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d histoireSame topicItalian Fascism and Post-war SocietyFrench-language works237,207