MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2573896095 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2008-0020

EFFECTS OF BRAKE DISC GEOMETRICAL PARAMETERS AND CONFIGURATIONS ON AUTOMOTIVE BRAKING THERMAL PERFORMACE

2008· article· en· W2573896095 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBrake Systems and Friction Analysis
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPillarDisc brakeAutomotive industryThermalAerodynamicsRotor (electric)BrakeParametric statisticsAutomotive engineeringMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Brake padMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringAerospace engineeringPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the effects of geometrical parameters of pillar post rotors on the thermal performance of automotive vehicle brakes. The thermal performance of vented disc brakes strongly depends on the aerodynamic characteristics of the air flow through the rotor passages. These air flow passages are determined by the geometrical parameters of the brake rotors. In this study, different pillar post rotor models are considered and the corresponding numerical simulations are performed, in order to investigate the effects of various geometrical parameters on the thermal performance. These geometrical parameters include the shape, size, and distribution of a pillar post. The new insight from these parametric studies provides useful guidelines to optimize the geometry of pillar post rotors of automotive vehicles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it