Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Is Associated with Prolonged Disease Control in Chemosensitive Aggressive Histology Lymphoma Patients When Done Early
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 4525 Introduction Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) is a treatment option in aggressive histology lymphoma (AG-NHL) patients who have either failed or relapsed after autologous SCT (ASCT) or if the potential for long term disease control after ASCT is limited. There is limited data in literature regarding the long term outcome of allo-SCT in AG-NHL. Methods We did a retrospective analysis of all aggressive histology patients who underwent Allo-SCT between 1989 and 2009 at our centre. A total of 41 patients with AG-NHL [diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and variants, follicular lymphoma grade 3 (FL3), biopsy proven aggressive transformation of indolent lymphoma (TRIL)] underwent Allo-SCT. All patients were in a chemosensitive remission at time of transplantation. The conditioning regimen was BU-CY in the majority (36 or 88%) of patients and 3 patients had reduced intensity transplantation (RIC) with fludarabine-based regimens. GVHD prophylaxis was cyclosporine and methotrexate until 2009 and was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil after that. Alemtuzumab was used in matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants in 5 (12%) cases. Results There were 22 (54%) males and 19 (46%) females. The median age at BMT was 48 years (range: 20–65). Fifteen (37%) had DLBCL, 19 (46%) had TRIL and 7 (17%) had FL3. Fifteen (37%) patients had received 2 or less lines of chemotherapy and 26 (63%) had received more than 2 lines of therapy at time of transplantation. The median number of chemo regimens was 3 (range: 1–7). The chemotherapy regimens included prior anthracyclines in 40 (98%), prior platinum in 26 (63%) and prior mini BEAM in 19 (46%). Six (15%) patients had received Rituximab and 9 (22%) had received prior RT. Seven (17%) patients had prior ASCT. Thirty-five (85%) of patients received matched related donor transplant whereas 5 (12%) received MUD transplant. The graft source was bone marrow in 33 (80%) and peripheral blood stem cells in 8 (20%). Grade 1–2 acute GVHD was seen in 53% and grade 3–4 in 9%. Chronic GVHD was seen in 51% patients. With a median follow up of 49 months and 96 months in those who are alive, five (12%) patients have relapsed, 20 (49%) patients are alive and in remission. Non relapse mortality (NRM) was 16/41 (39%) and predominantly related to infection. The overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of the entire cohort at 60 months was 55% (Fig-1). Patients, who had achieved CR pre-allo-SCT (compared to PR) had a statistically significantly improved PFS and OS (100% survival for those who were in CR). In multivariate analysis, number of chemotherapy regimens (≤2) was associated with improved OS (p=0.015) and presence of chronic GVHD showed a trend towards significant OS (p=0.052) Conclusions With a median follow up of 96 months in survivors, myeloablative allo-SCT is associated with durable remission in patients with chemosensitive AG-NHL. Results are less favourable in patients who have received multiple prior regimens. NRM remains a significant concern with myeloablative regimens. We believe there is a role for myeloablative regimens and research should focus on ways to reduce NRM in this setting. Disclosures: Gupta: Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".