MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2573939812

Object-relational queries over CFDI ∀- nc knowledge bases: OBDA for the SQL-literate

2016· article· en· W2573939812 on OpenAlexaff
Jason St. Jacques, David Toman, Grant Weddell

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSemantic Web and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSQLComputer scienceRelational databaseConjunctive queryRelational calculusObject (grammar)Description logicOntologyProgramming languageEncoding (memory)Data accessRelational modelTheoretical computer scienceInformation retrievalArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider how SQL-like query languages over object-relational schemata can be preserved in the setting of ontology based data access (OBDA), thus leveraging wide familiarity with relational technology. This is enabled by the adoption of the logic CFDInc∀-, a member of the CFD family of description logics (DLs). Of particular note is that this logic can fully simulate DL-LitecoreF, a member of the DL-Lite family commonly used in the OBDA setting. Our main results present efficient algorithms that allow computation of certain answers with respect to CFDInc∀- knowledge bases, facilitating direct access to a pre-existing row-based relational encoding of the data without any need for mappings to triple-based representations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Joint Conference on Artificial IntelligenceSame topicSemantic Web and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207