MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2573973042 · doi:10.1055/s-2004-819601

Protein glutathionylation in respiratory epithelial cell lines

2004· article· en· W2573973042 on OpenAlexaff
Nurlan Dauletbaev, Stan Kubow, LC Lands

Bibliographic record

VenuePneumologie · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRedox biology and oxidative stress
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiotinylationGlutathioneProteomicsBiochemistryProtein tyrosine phosphataseOxidative stressChemistryBiologyMolecular biologyCell biologySignal transductionEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glutathionylation is a reversible binding of glutathione (GSH) to SH-groups of proteins. Activity of many critical proteins (e.g. protein tyrosine phosphatase 1b, NF-kappaB, AP-1), involved in signal transduction during inflammation and oxidative stress, may be regulated through glutathionylation. Recently, a protocol using a biotinylated glutathione monoester to identify glutathionylated proteins was published (Sullivan DM et al, 2002). For our experiments, we modified this procedure and studied protein glutathionylation in respiratory epithelial cell lines (16HBE14o-, gift from Prof. D. Gruenert and A549, obtained from ATCC) exposed to hydrogen peroxide (1 or 24h). Glutathionylated proteins were affinity-purified from cell lysates and subjected to 2D gel electrophoresis. The described procedure revealed four glutathionylated proteins in hydrogen peroxide-stimulated samples. The mass-spectrometric identification of glutathionylated proteins is underway. Conclusion: protein glutathionylation is documented in respiratory epithelial cell lines. Further studies are planned to study the significance of protein glutathionylation in signal transduction during oxidative stress and glutathione augmentation. Supported by: NSERC and Canadian CF Foundation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePneumologieSame topicRedox biology and oxidative stressFrench-language works237,207