MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

To combat air inequality, governments and researchers must open their data

2016· article· en· W2574145276 on OpenAlexaff
C. A. Hasenkopf, David Cudjoe Adukpo, Michael Bräuer, L. Dewitt, Sarath Guttikunda, Alaa Ibrahim, Delgerzul Lodoisamba, N. Mutanyi, Gustavo Olivares, Pallavi Pant, Maëlle Salmon, Lodoysamba Sereeter

Bibliographic record

VenueClean Air Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInequalityAir pollutionAir quality indexPollutionTransformational leadershipPopulationPublic healthData qualityDevelopment economicsPolitical scienceNatural resource economicsGeographyEconomicsEnvironmental healthMeteorologyEconomyMathematicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Why open air quality data mattersAir pollution data measured by governments across the world are a public good that can lead to transformational advances in public health when made openly available. Such advances are needed because, according to the WHO, one out of every eight deaths in the world is due to air pollution (WHO 2014). These deaths disproportionately occur in high population density, lower income countries (WHO 2016), which, where data are available, often correspond to regions with higher long-term levels of ambient pollution (Figure 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.156
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.457
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1560.457
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0080.025
Scholarly communication0.0290.058
Open science0.0060.030
Research integrity0.0160.036
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.299
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.123 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClean Air JournalSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207