Development of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Understanding and Attitude towards Science Project by Teaching Management through Service Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to develop Pre-service Science Teachers’ (PSTs) understanding and attitude towards science by teaching management through service learning. The participants of this study were 9 volunteer PSTs who enrolled in 15-week Science and Technology Project in School course in the universities in Bangkok. This course focused on PSTs’ application of knowledge about science project to solve problem via doing community service. The researcher gathered data from observation, journal entries, and artifacts in the first semester of academic year 2015. Moreover, informal interviews were used for clarification. For data analysis, the researchers analyzed data with descriptive statistics and content analysis. Findings showed that most PSTs had increased understanding in doing a science project in aspects of integration to other learning disciplines, role of students, and role of advisors. Moreover, PSTs also increased their attitude towards a science project due to the construction of knowledge by themselves, development of many skills, and generation of societal benefits. These findings were considered in terms of further designing other courses activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.029 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.035 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it