Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article interroge la manière dont le roman contemporain intègre les nouvelles formes de sociabilités découlant de l’usage des dispositifs numériques permettant des échanges textuels (courriels et textos, par exemple). Les représentations des nouvelles habitudes d’interaction avec autrui, examinées dans Scrapbook de Nadine Bismuth et dans Les Charmes de l’impossible de Karine Glorieux, montrent que l’utilisation des dispositifs technologiques comme le téléphone cellulaire, la tablette et l’ordinateur ne contribuent pas à créer de la proximité, comme on pourrait le supposer de prime abord, mais bien de la distance et du vide. On remarque que si ces dispositifs agissent comme des médiateurs dans l’établissement et l’évolution des liens sociaux et affectifs entre les personnages, ils représentent aussi des éléments perturbateurs qui empêchent ces relations de se développer de manière harmonieuse et de durer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".