MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characteristics of children's physical activity during active play

2018· article· en· W2574376224 on OpenAlexaff
Asal Moghaddaszadeh, Veronica Jamnik, A. N. Belcastro

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreadmillLinear regressionVO2 maxPhysical activityLimits of agreementMathematicsMedicineAnimal sciencePhysical therapyStatisticsHeart rateInternal medicineNuclear medicineBlood pressureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that oxygen consumption (VO2) for self-paced physical activity (PA) is underestimated when applying laboratory-based treadmill (TM)-derived regression equations. This study examines the accelerometer (ACC) characteristics for paced TM PA and self-paced children's PA to ascertain if the predictable regulated patterns of paced PA are implicated in the inferior estimates of VO2. METHODS: Children's (9.3±1.2 years) (N.=21) VO2 (portable oxygen analyzer) and PA (accelerometry) were measured for paced treadmill PA (4-10 km/h). Active playing of children's games in a camp setting was used for self-paced PA. Treadmill and self-paced PA were compared by linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Relative contribution of each axes (% axis difference) for paced and self-paced PA were assessed (N.=21). RESULTS: The VO2 responses during paced treadmill exercise was linear with ACC quantified PA (for vertical axis r=0.95±0.03 and for vector magnitude [VM] r=0.95±0.05, P>0.05). During self-paced PA, the VO2 responses for ACC quantified PA were not linear (for vertical axis r=0.20±0.11 and for VM r=0.25±0.09) over the same range of ACC PA (0-1500 counts/10 s). VO2 estimates for self-paced PA (using TM-derived equations) were underestimated (P<0.05) across the range of intensities, which increased as the intensity of PA increased (>6 METs). Comparing paced versus self-paced PA the % axis dominance (i.e., difference between the highest and lowest axis) contribution to PA was 41±14% for paced and 3±2% for self-paced PA (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that the inferior estimates of VO2 for self-paced PA (using-derived linear equations) is attributable to the presence of a dominant axis with paced TM PA, which inflates the calculation of VM and the predicted VO2 for self-paced PA where no % axis difference exists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical FitnessSame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207