MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2574445949 · doi:10.1080/11926422.2016.1270846

Fighting corruption: contemporary measures in Canada

2017· article· en· W2574445949 on OpenAlexaffabout
Arvind K. Jain

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Foreign Policy Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCorruption and Economic Development
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLanguage changeEconomic rentCompetition (biology)Government (linguistics)LimitingPoliticsPolitical scienceBusinessPublic economicsEconomicsPolitical economyDevelopment economicsPublic administrationMarket economyLawEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fight against the breed of corruption that exists in Canada today requires a two-pronged approach: reduction of economic rents that can be exploited through corruption, and increase in the cost of engaging in corruption. Most of the recent efforts within Canada have targeted the second approach. Attempts are being made to weaken the link between private business and public officials (elected or appointed) through constraints on political contributions, lobbying abilities and the exchange of gifts. The challenge is to also allow competition to prevail while limiting the misuse of the regulatory powers of the government. In addition, Canada must make a serious effort to decrease its acceptance of corruption abroad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Foreign Policy JournalSame topicCorruption and Economic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207