MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2574565952 · doi:10.3968/8981

The Style Features of Hubei Tujia Folk Songs: Taking Dragon Boat Tune as an Example

2016· article· en· W2574565952 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhang Jiefu

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Musicological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStyle (visual arts)SingingFolk songFeatherEthnic groupArtTone (literature)Folk musicHistoryLiteratureGeographyAnthropologySociologyAcousticsEcologyBiologyMusical

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hubei Tujia folk songs have rich contents. It has obvious ethnic feathers, which fully describe Tujia’s information, including ethnic appearance, psychological feathers and characteristic feathers. Those songs have recorded the development process and life stories of Tujia, as well as historic culture, folk arts and ethnic traditions. In this paper, we analyzed music style feather and singing feather based on Dragonhead Tone, a Hubei Tujia folk song, in order to inherit and develop Hubei Tujia folk songs better.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicDiverse Musicological StudiesFrench-language works237,207