MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Identification and Characterization of Zebrafish Mast Cells.

2007· article· en· W2574630961 on OpenAlexaff
Jason N. Berman, Jake Seibert, Tristan Dobson, Eve Teh, Оlga Hrytsenko, Bill Pohajdak, Robert Fraser, Barry H. Paw, Tong‐Jun Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMast cells and histamine
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZebrafishBiologyGATA1TryptaseCell biologyHaematopoiesisMorpholinoDegranulationProgenitor cellGene knockdownMast cellMolecular biologyImmunologyStem cellCell cultureGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mast cells (MCs), tissue counterparts to mammalian basophils, are known for their role in allergic reactions, inflammation and cancer progression, yet their developmental origin remains controversial due to limitations studying these cells in traditional animal models. The zebrafish provides a highly efficient system for studying vertebrate MC development. All other major hematopoietic lineages have zebrafish counterparts and the fundamental genetic mechanisms controlling hematopoiesis are well conserved. We are the first to identify zebrafish MCs in the gill and intestine. These cells demonstrate classic MC phenotypes including prominent metachromatic granules following staining with toluidine blue and positive immunohistochemical reactions to antibodies against human tryptase and C-KIT. Electron microscopy demonstrates a striking morphologic resemblance to mammalian MCs. Functional studies using the stimulating agent, Compound 48/80 or formalin-killed Aeromonas result in MC degranulation and increased blood levels of key mediators, such as tryptase. These cells also express carboxypeptidase A5 (cpa5), a zebrafish homologue of the human mast cell-specific CPA enzymes. Cpa5 expression in zebrafish embryonic blood cells begins at 24 hours post fertilization and co-localizes with a number of established granulocytic and monocytic markers suggesting that MCs arise from a common granulocyte/monocyte progenitor. Morpholino knockdown studies have demonstrated that the transcription factors gata-2 and pu.1, but not gata-1 are necessary for early MC development. Interestingly, friend of gata-1 (fog-1) may also be required, but in a gata-1 dependent manner. Ongoing morpholino and mutant rescue studies will further establish in vivo the contribution that these transcription factors make to vertebrate MC development. Finally, we have cloned a cpa5 promoter element and shown it can drive expression of the green fluorescent protein in early zebrafish MCs providing a means for generating transgenic zebrafish lines to model human MC diseases for use in high throughput small molecule modifier screens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMast cells and histamineFrench-language works237,207