MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W257466784

LET'S SHOW CANADA THAT VETERINARIANS CARE!: May 5–11, 2002.

2002· article· en· W257466784 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janice Mercer

Bibliographic record

VenueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicVeterinary Practice and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSloganHonorMedicinePaymentHealth careOrder (exchange)Animal healthFamily medicineNursingVeterinary medicineBusinessPolitical scienceInternet privacyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Are you looking for a way to promote your clinic and profession, educate your clients about responsible animal ownership, and show Canada that Veterinarians Care? Animal Health Week (AHW) is a unique promotional opportunity that will help to increase your profile in the community. The slogan for this year's campaign, “VETERINARIANS: www.animalhealthCARE.ca” or “Veterinarians Care,” illustrates the importance of the veterinarian's role in the lives of animals and animal owners. It delivers the message that veterinarians care not only about animals and animal health, but about human health and safety as well. Veterinarians are family doctors for our pets and play an important role in ensuring that the food we consume from farm animals is wholesome and safe. The 2002 Animal Health Week campaign gives veterinarians working in all capacities an opportunity to show how much they care. Private practitioners can do this by promoting responsible animal ownership and by introducing their clients to the official Web site of the veterinary profession in Canada, www.animalhealthcare.ca. With this journal you have received a complimentary poster sponsored by Hill's Pet Nutrition and Pet Plan Insurance, to be displayed in a prominent place in your clinic. More copies are available for purchase. Other promotional items available for the 2002 campaign include: t-shirts, sponsored by Merial; balloons, sponsored by Scotiabank; color temporary tattoos; and cat and mouse bookmarks. Complete the enclosed order form and return it to the CVMA with payment as soon as possible. Unfortunately, we cannot honor orders received after February 15, 2002. These items are normally used as giveaways to clients and their children during the Animal Health Week campaign. Watch for upcoming articles with tips on how to make the most of AHW! Topics will include special event planning, media relations, school presentations, and more. For assistance or questions concerning Animal Health Week, please contact the CVMA Communications Office at 1 (800) 567-2862 ext. 19. (by Janice Mercer, Manager, Communications, CVMA)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6990.492

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)Same topicVeterinary Practice and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207