MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2574797215 · doi:10.1055/s-0035-1554298

Link N as a Therapeutic Agent to Treat Pain Associated with Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

2015· article· en· W2574797215 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hussain Noorwali, Padma Madiraju, Michael P. Grant, Laura M. Epure, John Antoniou, Fackson Mwale

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Spine Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNerve growth factorMedicineNeurotrophinIntervertebral discSubstance PNeurotrophic factorsExtracellular matrixInternal medicineBack painDegeneration (medical)ReceptorEndocrinologyAnatomyPathologyCell biologyNeuropeptideBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The intervertebral discs (IVDs) are the largest avascular tissues in the body characterized by an abundant extracellular matrix and low cell density, with innervation limited at the most peripheral annular layers. During IVD degeneration, the neurotrophins, nerve growth factor (NGF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), can stimulate nerve growth and hyperinnervation of the inner annulus fibrosus (AF) and nucleus pulposus (NP), which further could lead to back pain. Back pain can potentially be suppressed by BMP4 supplementation to decrease the density of innervation. Link N is a naturally occurring peptide that can stimulate BMP4 in human IVDs. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of Link N on NGF, BDNF, and substance P (SP) in human AF cells stimulated with cytokines or punctured bovine discs and determine the possible mechanisms related to its effect. Material and Methods Human lumbar spines were obtained through Héma-Québec harvesting organ donation within 24 hour after death. Annulus fibrosus (AF) cells were isolated from AF region of human IVDs with Thompson grade 2 of degeneration, cultured in monolayers and stimulated with TNFα (100 ng/mL) and IL1β (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of Link N (1 µg/mL) for 48 hours. Total RNA was isolated and gene expression of neurotrophins, substance P, and their receptors was measured using RT PCR. AF cells isolated from human IVDs with Thompson grade 4 were cultured for 48 hours with or without Link N (1 µg/mL) and the NGF release in the media was measured by Western blotting. Coccygeal IVDs from the tails of adult bovine steers (20–25 months) were isolated with the cartilaginous endplates. After 24 hours preconditioning in complete DMEM, the IVDs were treated (control, capsaicin [1.5 µg/mL), punctured by 16 G needle, punctured by 16 G needle and incubated with Link N [10 µg/mL]) and the disc culture media was collected at different time points for analysis. SP in the media was concentrated by solid phase extraction and was assayed by Elisa. Results Proinflammatory cytokines IL1β and TNFα have been shown to trigger the expression of NGF and SP, as well as promoting the degradation of the extracellular matrix in human IVD cells. Our results demonstrate that gene expression of NGF, BDNF, TrkA, and TrkB significantly decreased in human disc cells stimulated with either IL-1β or TNFα supplemented with Link N when compared with the control. Additionally, Link N was also able to inhibit NGF release in the media when AF grade 4 was stimulated with IL-1β. Link N supplementation also led to a significant decrease in SP after 24 hour in injured discs, when compared with controls. Conclusion Link N can suppress the stimulation of NGF, BDNF, and their receptors TrkA and TrkB, respectively, as well as the neurotransmitter SP in degenerate discs. This suggests that Link N has the potential to inhibit pain induced by neuronal innervation caused by disc degeneration. Thus, administration of Link N has the potential to not only repair the discs in early stages of the disease but also suppress pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Spine JournalSame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207